Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tap seems to be broken #18

Closed
sludtke42 opened this issue Dec 27, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Tap seems to be broken #18

sludtke42 opened this issue Dec 27, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@sludtke42
Copy link

This is my first attempt with Homebrew (10.13):

brew tap pothosware/homebrew-pothos

==> Tapping pothosware/pothos
Cloning into '/usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Taps/pothosware/homebrew-pothos'...
remote: Counting objects: 29, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (29/29), done.
remote: Total 29 (delta 10), reused 4 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Unpacking objects: 100% (29/29), done.
Error: Invalid formula: /usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Taps/pothosware/homebrew-pothos/pothossoapy.rb
No available formula with the name "pothossoapy"
In formula file: /usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Taps/pothosware/homebrew-pothos/pothossoapy.rb
Expected to find class Pothossoapy, but only found: Pothossdr.
Error: Invalid formula: /usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Taps/pothosware/homebrew-pothos/pothosflow.rb
No available formula with the name "pothosflow"
In formula file: /usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Taps/pothosware/homebrew-pothos/pothosflow.rb
Expected to find class Pothosflow, but only found: Pothosgui.
Error: Cannot tap pothosware/pothos: invalid syntax in tap!

@guruofquality
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I made a quick rename for the formula files after the release and forgot to test. I forgot to also rename the formula/class itself. Does it work now?

@sludtke42
Copy link
Author

sludtke42 commented Dec 27, 2017 via email

@guruofquality
Copy link
Contributor

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants