Geometry Suite for Processing (PGS)

[micycle1]

Properties File URL

https://github.com/micycle1/PGS/releases/download/latest/GeometrySuiteForProcessing.txt

Home Page URL

https://github.com/micycle1/PGS

Guidelines Confirmation

• I confirm

[github-actions]

There was an error in reading your properties file or parsing it.

Please ensure that the URL is correct and the file follows the required format.

Errors when parsing file. Please check all required fields, and file format.

[micycle1]

@SableRaf

Errored. This is the contents, which AFAIK is correct.

name=Geometry Suite for Processing
category=Geometry
authors=[Michael Carleton](https://github.com/micycle1/)
url=https://github.com/micycle1/PGS
sentence=All things computational geometry
paragraph=PGS provides easy access to 2D geometric algorithms across a rich range of computational geometry subjects: circle packing, mesh-coloring, contouring, hulls, meshing, morphology, geometric optimisation, point and segment set generation, shape boolean operations, shape predicates, tilings, geometric transformation, triangulation, voronoi diagrams.
version=200
prettyVersion=2.0
lastUpdated=0
minRevision=4
maxRevision=0

[SableRaf]

Thanks @micycle1. We're actively working on the workflows for this repository so it's possible something is not working as it should right now. I'll keep you posted!

[mingness]

@micycle1 multiple categories can apply, so at the moment, the script strictly accepts the fieldname categories for new submissions. In the past category was accepted and the scripts accept category for existing files, but not for new submissions. This topic is under consideration in issue #45. I recommend to change the fieldname to categories. The rest looks good.

[micycle1]

Ok, amended.
The action needs retriggered.

[github-actions]

Your properties file was successfully parsed.
A pull request with your contribution has been successfully created.

[SableRaf]

Ok, amended. The action needs retriggered.

Great! The action retriggers automatically when you edit the original issue. @mingness we could specify this in the bot comment for clarity.