Skip to content

Conversation

dmasad
Copy link
Member

@dmasad dmasad commented May 10, 2015

This seems to successfully makes the model running by the server concurrent (addressing #35 ), but I'm not 100% sure that it isn't doing something horribly wrong.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 25.18% when pulling 3731b00 on concurrency.35 into 77537db on clean_modules.79.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 25.18% when pulling 3731b00 on concurrency.35 into 77537db on clean_modules.79.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 25.18% when pulling 1345633 on concurrency.35 into 77537db on clean_modules.79.

dmasad added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2015
@dmasad dmasad merged commit 6781d88 into clean_modules.79 May 16, 2015
@dmasad
Copy link
Member Author

dmasad commented May 16, 2015

Consolidating the visualization modifications into a single branch.

@dmasad dmasad deleted the concurrency.35 branch May 16, 2015 20:02
@jackiekazil jackiekazil added this to the Unknown milestone milestone Nov 22, 2020
EwoutH pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
EwoutH pushed a commit to EwoutH/mesa that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants