Skip to content

Refactor command handler #82

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2023
Merged

Refactor command handler #82

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2023

Conversation

parfeon
Copy link
Contributor

@parfeon parfeon commented Dec 28, 2022

test(github-action): refactor command handler

Refactor command handler workflow to use bot name from secrets.

@parfeon
test(github-action): refactor command handler
3f894bf 
Refactor command handler workflow to use bot name from secrets.
@parfeon parfeon added status: done This issue is considered resolved. priority: medium This PR should be reviewed after all high priority PRs. type: build This PR contains changes to the build system (like Travis or publishing a package). labels Dec 28, 2022
@parfeon parfeon self-assigned this Dec 28, 2022
@parfeon parfeon merged commit 2edc2aa into master Jan 3, 2023
@parfeon parfeon deleted the refactor/command-handler/refactor-handler-workflow branch January 3, 2023 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mohitpubnub mohitpubnub mohitpubnub approved these changes

@budgetpreneur budgetpreneur Awaiting requested review from budgetpreneur

+1 more reviewer

@MikeDobrzan MikeDobrzan MikeDobrzan approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees

@parfeon parfeon

Labels
priority: medium This PR should be reviewed after all high priority PRs. status: done This issue is considered resolved. type: build This PR contains changes to the build system (like Travis or publishing a package).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@parfeon @mohitpubnub @MikeDobrzan