Skip to content

Conversation

bowlofeggs
Copy link

The Travis build will not pass until this is merged:

pulp/pulp#1862

The Jenkins build on this PR will never pass, because this PR fixes the Jenkins build ☺

@pulpbot
Copy link
Member

pulpbot commented May 18, 2015

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com//job/unittest-pulp_python-pr/2/

Build result: FAILURE

[...truncated 5 lines...]Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > git config remote.origin.url https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git # timeout=10Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git > git --version # timeout=10 > git fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ > git rev-parse refs/remotes/origin/pr/41/merge^{commit} # timeout=10 > git rev-parse refs/remotes/origin/origin/pr/41/merge^{commit} # timeout=10Checking out Revision f8b11fbf91fa13416f26e3e8b63e78e9d86fab5d (refs/remotes/origin/pr/41/merge) > git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > git checkout -f f8b11fbf91fa13416f26e3e8b63e78e9d86fab5dFirst time build. Skipping changelog.Triggering rhel6-npTriggering f20-npTriggering f21-npTriggering rhel7-nprhel6-np completed with result FAILUREf20-np completed with result FAILUREf21-np completed with result FAILURErhel7-np completed with result FAILUREStarted calculate disk usage of buildFinished Calculation of disk usage of build in 0 secondsStarted calculate disk usage of workspaceFinished Calculation of disk usage of workspace in 0 secondsSetting status of 852a122 to FAILURE with url https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/unittest-pulp_python-pr/2/ and message: Merged build finished.
Test FAILed.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 852a122 on rbarlow:test_requirements into e92079d on pulp:master.

@bowlofeggs
Copy link
Author

I need someone to review this, even with failing CI. This PR exists to stop the failing CI ☺

@beav
Copy link
Contributor

beav commented May 19, 2015

looks like it just adds "mock" to the dependencies

LGTM

@bowlofeggs bowlofeggs force-pushed the test_requirements branch from 852a122 to 02f530b Compare May 19, 2015 16:02
@pulpbot
Copy link
Member

pulpbot commented May 19, 2015

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com//job/unittest-pulp_python-pr/3/

Build result: FAILURE

[...truncated 5 lines...]Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > git config remote.origin.url https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git # timeout=10Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git > git --version # timeout=10 > git fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ > git rev-parse refs/remotes/origin/pr/41/merge^{commit} # timeout=10 > git rev-parse refs/remotes/origin/origin/pr/41/merge^{commit} # timeout=10Checking out Revision b78843ae23b4edab8862b66e6975dcfe095ba5d9 (refs/remotes/origin/pr/41/merge) > git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > git checkout -f b78843ae23b4edab8862b66e6975dcfe095ba5d9First time build. Skipping changelog.Triggering f21-npTriggering f20-npTriggering rhel6-npTriggering rhel7-npf21-np completed with result FAILUREf20-np completed with result FAILURErhel6-np completed with result FAILURErhel7-np completed with result FAILUREStarted calculate disk usage of buildFinished Calculation of disk usage of build in 0 secondsStarted calculate disk usage of workspaceFinished Calculation of disk usage of workspace in 0 secondsSetting status of 02f530b to FAILURE with url https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/unittest-pulp_python-pr/3/ and message: Merged build finished.
Test FAILed.

@bowlofeggs bowlofeggs merged commit 02f530b into pulp:master May 19, 2015
@bowlofeggs bowlofeggs deleted the test_requirements branch May 19, 2015 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants