Skip to content

add storetype parameter comparison to 'destroy' method #333

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2020
Merged

add storetype parameter comparison to 'destroy' method #333

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2020

Conversation

mwpower
Copy link

@mwpower mwpower commented Oct 15, 2020

Without this comparison, attempting to destroy a jceks keystore will
fail.

@mwpower mwpower requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2020 19:11
Without this comparison, attempting to destroy a jceks keystore will
fail.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 15, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #333 into main will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #333      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.13%   68.24%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         273      274       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          186      187       +1     
  Misses         87       87              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/puppet/provider/java_ks/keytool.rb 57.37% <100.00%> (+0.23%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba5325c...d2b22b9. Read the comment docs.

@michaeltlombardi michaeltlombardi merged commit ff86ead into puppetlabs:main Oct 16, 2020
@mwpower mwpower deleted the destroy_comparator branch October 16, 2020 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants