Abstract for JOSS journal #70
Conversation
Update qiskit_terra version on Dockerfile
Update with recent modification in the Wiki
|
@toncho11 I have updated the paper with the latest text from the wiki. Please, review when you have time. |
|
@toncho11 will have little time to work on this abstract. @qbarthelemy or @sylvchev will you be available to review this? |
|
It's a good idea, but I think that we should publish pyRiemann before. @sylvchev @plcrodrigues @agramfort |
Agreed. |
|
I am not sure. How much time will take to publish pyRiemann? This risks blocking pyRiemann-Qiskit for a very long time. |
|
We should consider publishing a JOSS paper on pyRiemann yes. To cite pyRiemann in this paper we can use a zenodo DOI but I am moderately convinced it's useful in the long run. |
|
Once pyRiemann is published on JoSS, I think we still have time to update the reference to it in this paper. pyRiemann-qiskit is not as mature as pyRiemann and I think it will take some time before it gets published. This is why it may be a good idea to start the process soon, what do you think ? Side question: do you want me to prepare the workflow in pyRiemann repo ? |
|
Hello. Did you have some time to think about it? |
|
Ok, I am not sure what action I need to take for this PR now. Shall we proceed or wait for pyRiemann? If yes, is something like the end of november could work? @qbarthelemy |
|
I asked @alexandrebarachant to have access to zenodo. I don't see anything
happening very soon on pyRiemann otherwise
… Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Yes, I have a draft for Pyriemann targeting https://jmlr.org/mloss/ that I need to reorganize before sharing. It will happen soon! |
|
Ok, thank you for the update. I will wait for Zenodo DOI and pyRiemann draft to be ready then. |
|
let's discuss the target journal to maximize our chances and be in the
right scope.
Sylvain call me ok?
… Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
a few things for me need to be decided first:
- who is onboard? One solution is to add to the paper anyone who
contributed in the past but this deserves some discussion I guess.
- who is leading this? First author? Senior Author?
feel free to voice your opinion
… Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
How did you guys do for |
|
When we look at the number of lines modified, |
|
since the last zenodo entry I would say it's me and Quentin mostly who
arrived in the game no?
… Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
I would have kept the first seven contributors. |
add reference to pyRiemann
change affiliation order
This reverts commit 0a4562e.
(this is likely not allowed for security reasons).
|
Hi, do you have some update with the pyriemann paper? If no, I have referenced the Zenodo DOI of pyRiemann so we could start the submission. |
|
@gcattan you can now refer to PyRiemann with this bibtex https://github.com/pyRiemann/pyRiemann/blob/master/README.md#how-to-cite |
The full JOSS recommendation are here. Below, the summary:
The compiled PDF version is downloadable as an artifact here.