-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
Update to SDL 2.32.8 #3481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to SDL 2.32.8 #3481
Conversation
I'm unsure how to deal with drm failure @ankith26. We could move 123->124 and update the checksum? |
I don't think they changed the release file, its more likely that it was just some network issue or something else that lead to this. We can try doing a rerun in a few hours/days and seeing if this issue persists |
I checked locally several attempts, the file hash does not match. |
You are right... the hash did actually change. I extracted the archive and yes, the name of the top level folder definitely changed.
I think this makes sense. |
45c3375
to
f703a49
Compare
Previous one failed hash checks because they renamed a folder (apparently?).
f703a49
to
fcfd235
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Also updates libdrm because the old setup was failing to build.