Skip to content

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Mar 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Renamed the "Developer" section to "Support & Contribution" to better emphasize community support.
    • Added links for reporting issues and submitting pull requests.
    • Updated contribution guidelines and instructions to help users engage with the project.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the documentation by renaming the "Developer" section to "Support & Contribution" in both the README.md file and the notebooks/4-developer.ipynb notebook. The changes add new sub-items for "Issues" and "Pull Requests" while retaining the existing "Communication" and "External Executables" entries. The revised texts now provide clearer guidance on reporting issues and submitting pull requests within the documentation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md, notebooks/4-developer.ipynb Renamed the "Developer" section to "Support & Contribution"; added new links/sections for "Issues" and "Pull Requests"; retained the "Communication" and "External Executables" entries; updated guidance text.

Possibly related PRs

  • pyiron/executorlib#558: Similar renaming of the "Developer" section and documentation updates to promote contributions.
  • pyiron/executorlib#560: Addresses the same section renaming and adds guidance for issue reporting and pull request submissions.

Poem

In my burrow of docs so bright,
I hop to make the changes light.
“Developer” now wears a brand new name,
“Support & Contribution” joins the game.
With issues and pulls on the menu,
I celebrate with a joyful “HOP!” 🐰


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.40%. Comparing base (8195183) to head (e9aa54e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #616   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.40%   96.40%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        1252     1252           
=======================================
  Hits         1207     1207           
  Misses         45       45           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
notebooks/4-developer.ipynb (1)

1-1: Consider adding a Contributing Guidelines file

While the current documentation is good, consider also creating a separate CONTRIBUTING.md file in the repository root that contains these guidelines, as this is a common practice that makes contribution information more discoverable.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8195183 and e9aa54e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • notebooks/4-developer.ipynb (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_win
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
  • GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
  • GitHub Check: notebooks
🔇 Additional comments (6)
notebooks/4-developer.ipynb (3)

1-1: Great job enhancing the documentation structure and clarity!

The change from "Developer" to "Support and Contribution" makes the project more welcoming to external contributors. The comprehensive sections on Issues and Pull Requests provide clear guidance for potential contributors.


1-1: Well-structured content with appropriate subsections

The new organization with dedicated sections for Issues and Pull Requests follows best practices for open-source project documentation, making it easier for new contributors to understand how they can participate.


1-1: Helpful guidance for issue reporting

The Issues section provides valuable guidance on creating reproducible test cases and offers a clear benchmark (compatibility with ProcessPoolExecutor/ThreadPoolExecutor) for determining when an issue is worth reporting.

README.md (3)

149-155: Excellent alignment with notebook documentation

The README changes correctly reflect the renamed section and structure in the notebooks/4-developer.ipynb file, maintaining consistency across documentation sources.


149-151: Good addition of new subsections

Adding dedicated links for Issues and Pull Requests makes these important contribution pathways more discoverable for new contributors.


154-155: Appropriate preservation of technical documentation

Good decision to maintain the existing technical sections (Communication and External Executables) while reorganizing them under the new "Support & Contribution" heading.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit e4d1347 into main Mar 25, 2025
50 of 51 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the support branch March 25, 2025 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant