Skip to content

Conversation

niklassiemer
Copy link
Member

@niklassiemer niklassiemer commented Aug 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Adds a utility to summarize a structure by counting atoms per chemical element and exposes it via the package public API for easy import.
  • Tests
    • Adds unit tests verifying composition counts for representative structures (single-element and mixed-element cases).

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a new helper function get_number_species_atoms(structure: Atoms) that counts chemical symbols from structure.get_chemical_symbols() and returns a mapping; re-exports it at package and common levels; adds unit tests verifying counts for simple structures.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Helper utility
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py
Added get_number_species_atoms(structure: Atoms) that iterates structure.get_chemical_symbols() and returns a {symbol: count} mapping.
Public API exports
structuretoolkit/__init__.py, structuretoolkit/common/__init__.py
Imported and re-exported get_number_species_atoms to expose it from structuretoolkit.common and the top-level structuretoolkit package; updated __all__.
Tests
tests/test_helpers.py
Added test_get_number_species_atoms with subtests: Fe8 (bulk('Fe') -> {'Fe': 8}) and Al2Fe8 (mixed repeats -> {'Fe': 8, 'Al': 2}).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant Helper as get_number_species_atoms
    participant Structure as Atoms

    Caller->>Helper: get_number_species_atoms(structure)
    Helper->>Structure: structure.get_chemical_symbols()
    Structure-->>Helper: list of symbols
    Helper-->>Caller: return {symbol: count}
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

I hop through lattices with careful, tiny paws,
Counting Fe and Al without a single pause.
Symbols tallied, neat and bright,
Carrots cheer each counted byte. 🥕

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1476f0 and 419685a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • structuretoolkit/common/__init__.py (2 hunks)
  • structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_helpers.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • structuretoolkit/common/helper.py
  • structuretoolkit/common/init.py
  • tests/test_helpers.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (windows-latest, 3.12, win-64-py-3-12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (macos-latest, 3.12, osx-64-py-3-12)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch num_species_atoms_helper

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.13%. Comparing base (40b788d) to head (419685a).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #383      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.10%   83.13%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        1859     1862       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1545     1548       +3     
  Misses        314      314              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (3)

18-18: Prefer literal {} over dict() (ruff C408).

Minor style/lint fix; consistent with the rest of the module.

-    species_dict = dict()
+    species_dict = {}

8-16: Tighten docstring and add a return type hint.

Optional polish to align with the file’s existing docstring style and add a lightweight return annotation.

-def get_number_species_atoms(structure: Atoms):
-    """Returns a dictionary with the species in the structure and the corresponding count in the structure
+def get_number_species_atoms(structure: Atoms) -> dict:
+    """Return a mapping from chemical symbol to atom count.
 
     Args:
-        structure
+        structure (ase.atoms.Atoms): The atomic structure.
 
     Returns:
-        dict: A dictionary with the species and the corresponding count
+        dict: {symbol: count} Per-species atom counts.
 
     """

18-21: Optional: simplify counting using ASE’s indices.

You can avoid the manual loop by leveraging structure.symbols.indices(), which is already used elsewhere in this file.

-    species_dict = {}
-    for i in structure.get_chemical_symbols():
-        species_dict[i] = species_dict.get(i, 0) + 1
-    return species_dict
+    return {el: len(idx) for el, idx in structure.symbols.indices().items()}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 858fe3b and 94a25e8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py

18-18: Unnecessary dict() call (rewrite as a literal)

Rewrite as a literal

(C408)


21-21: Undefined name specied_dict

(F821)

Comment on lines 8 to 21
def get_number_species_atoms(structure: Atoms):
"""Returns a dictionary with the species in the structure and the corresponding count in the structure
Args:
structure
Returns:
dict: A dictionary with the species and the corresponding count
"""
species_dict = dict()
for i in structure.get_chemical_symbols():
species_dict[i] = species_dict.get(i, 0) + 1
return specied_dict
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Add unit tests for the new helper.

A simple test with a small molecule (e.g., H2O or CO2) will prevent regressions like the current typo.

Run this to check whether tests already cover the function:

If missing, I can draft a test like:

def test_get_number_species_atoms_h2o():
    from ase import Atoms
    from structuretoolkit.common.helper import get_number_species_atoms
    atoms = Atoms('H2O')
    assert get_number_species_atoms(atoms) == {'H': 2, 'O': 1}

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages or tests referencing the new helper
rg -n -C2 --type=py 'get_number_species_atoms\s*\('

Length of output: 392


Add missing unit tests for get_number_species_atoms

We didn’t find any existing tests covering this helper, so regressions (like the current specied_dict typo) won’t be caught automatically. Please add at least one unit test with a simple molecule—e.g., H₂O or CO₂—such as:

# tests/test_helper.py

from ase import Atoms
from structuretoolkit.common.helper import get_number_species_atoms

def test_get_number_species_atoms_h2o():
    atoms = Atoms('H2O')
    assert get_number_species_atoms(atoms) == {'H': 2, 'O': 1}

Let me know if you’d like assistance drafting more cases.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)

18-18: Unnecessary dict() call (rewrite as a literal)

Rewrite as a literal

(C408)


21-21: Undefined name specied_dict

(F821)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In structuretoolkit/common/helper.py around lines 8 to 21, the function returns
specied_dict (typo) instead of the built species_dict and there are no unit
tests to catch this; fix the function to return species_dict and add a unit test
file tests/test_helper.py that constructs a simple molecule (e.g., Atoms('H2O'))
and asserts get_number_species_atoms returns the expected mapping (e.g., {'H':
2, 'O': 1}); ensure the test imports ASE Atoms and the helper function and
include the new test in the test suite.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (4)

8-17: Polish: add explicit return type and tighten the docstring.

Minor typing/docs tweak for clarity and consistency with the rest of the module.

-def get_number_species_atoms(structure: Atoms):
-    """Returns a dictionary with the species in the structure and the corresponding count in the structure
+def get_number_species_atoms(structure: Atoms) -> dict[str, int]:
+    """Return a mapping from chemical symbol to count.
@@
-    Args:
-        structure
+    Args:
+        structure (ase.atoms.Atoms): Atomic structure to analyze.
@@
-    Returns:
-        dict: A dictionary with the species and the corresponding count
+    Returns:
+        dict[str, int]: Counts per species.

Note: If you still support Python < 3.9, prefer -> Dict[str, int] and from typing import Dict.


18-21: Consider a shorter, consistent implementation using ASE indices (or numpy).

This aligns with get_species_indices_dict and avoids a manual loop. Performance-wise, it’s on par and leverages ASE’s internal symbol index mapping.

-    species_dict = {}
-    for i in structure.get_chemical_symbols():
-        species_dict[i] = species_dict.get(i, 0) + 1
-    return species_dict
+    return {el: len(indices) for el, indices in structure.symbols.indices().items()}

Alternatively (uses only NumPy already imported, but sorts symbols):

symbols, counts = np.unique(structure.get_chemical_symbols(), return_counts=True)
return dict(zip(symbols.tolist(), counts.tolist()))

8-8: Naming nit: consider get_species_counts (or get_number_of_atoms_per_species).

This would mirror get_species_indices_dict more closely and read cleaner. Since it’s a new API, renaming now avoids a future breaking change.


8-21: Add a regression unit test for get_number_species_atoms

I didn’t find any existing tests covering this helper—please add one to catch typos and guard against future changes. For example:

# tests/test_helper.py
from ase import Atoms
from structuretoolkit.common.helper import get_number_species_atoms

def test_get_number_species_atoms_h2o():
    atoms = Atoms('H2O')
    assert get_number_species_atoms(atoms) == {'H': 2, 'O': 1}

• Create a new file at tests/test_helper.py (or add to your existing test suite)
• Ensure ase is available in the test environment so this import works

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94a25e8 and d7e1cbc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (windows-latest, 3.12, win-64-py-3-12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (ubuntu-latest, 3.10, linux-64-py-3-10)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (ubuntu-latest, 3.11, linux-64-py-3-11)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (ubuntu-latest, 3.12, linux-64-py-3-12)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (1)

18-21: Species-count logic is correct and straightforward.

The counting over structure.get_chemical_symbols() is functionally correct and clear.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7e1cbc and c1476f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • structuretoolkit/__init__.py (2 hunks)
  • structuretoolkit/common/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_helpers.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
tests/test_helpers.py (1)
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (1)
  • get_number_species_atoms (8-21)
structuretoolkit/__init__.py (1)
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (1)
  • get_number_species_atoms (8-21)
structuretoolkit/common/__init__.py (1)
structuretoolkit/common/helper.py (1)
  • get_number_species_atoms (8-21)
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
structuretoolkit/common/__init__.py

7-7: structuretoolkit.common.helper.get_number_species_atoms imported but unused; consider removing, adding to __all__, or using a redundant alias

(F401)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (windows-latest, 3.12, win-64-py-3-12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (ubuntu-latest, 3.10, linux-64-py-3-10)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (macos-latest, 3.12, osx-64-py-3-12)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_old
🔇 Additional comments (2)
structuretoolkit/__init__.py (2)

91-96: Re-export looks good

get_number_species_atoms is correctly re-exported at the top-level namespace via from structuretoolkit.common import .... This enables structuretoolkit.get_number_species_atoms as intended.


117-117: all updated appropriately

Including "get_number_species_atoms" in __all__ ensures the symbol is part of the public API surface. LGTM.

Co-authored-by: Jan Janssen <jan-janssen@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@niklassiemer niklassiemer merged commit b2ec785 into main Aug 18, 2025
18 checks passed
@niklassiemer niklassiemer deleted the num_species_atoms_helper branch August 18, 2025 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants