-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
improvements to glm.ipynb #179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
@OriolAbril I've taken care of all the comments, copying this comment from the previous PR over here so it stays in my head. _
_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB OriolAbril commented on 2021-06-18T11:54:05Z Here is where I think we should add a sentence on what the common key passed to priors means. Maybe
The "common" key in the priors dict defines the prior for all common effects at the same time. As explained in a section below, Bambi supports two types of effects, common and group effects. |
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB OriolAbril commented on 2021-06-18T11:54:06Z I would leave the explanation text as it was originally and only remove the link to the source code. I find the extra explanation inside the parenthesis a bit confusing here, because here we are talking about common and group as types of effects, not as keys of the |
@almostmeenal just address Oriol's comment and this is good to merge. |
thanks a ton for the help @OriolAbril !!!! |
@fonnesbeck this is done, i'm sorry for the delay :(( |
glm.ipynb is not broken anymore after #177, a few minor updates in documentation or markdown cells are still left, doing them in this PR as i get time, nothing urgent, but everyone feel free to make suggestions!!!!