Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix handling of extras #252

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2018
Merged

Conversation

benoit-pierre
Copy link
Member

Ensure extras are properly canonicalized, so corresponding Provides-Dist markers will match with the list of extras returned by pkg_resources. See pypa/pip#4617.

@agronholm
Copy link
Contributor

Please rebase this against master and I will merge.

Ensure extras are properly canonicalized, so corresponding
`Provides-Dist` markers will match with the list of extras
returned by pkg_resources.
@benoit-pierre
Copy link
Member Author

Done.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #252 into master will increase coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #252      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.41%   59.56%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         818      821       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          486      489       +3     
  Misses        332      332
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
wheel/metadata.py 97.5% <100%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6f26efa...ebe0cf1. Read the comment docs.

@agronholm agronholm merged commit 22a311a into pypa:master Sep 24, 2018
@agronholm
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@benoit-pierre benoit-pierre deleted the fix_extras_handling branch September 24, 2018 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants