Skip to content

Conversation

olegpidsadnyi
Copy link
Contributor

@olegpidsadnyi olegpidsadnyi commented Jun 21, 2016

Fixes #156
Actually the current error is correct, only the message is ambiguous.
It should be a FeatureError to communicate the line where it breaks and it should mention that the step is defined outside of a scenario or a background.


This change is Reviewable

@The-Compiler
Copy link
Member

LGTM! Travis is still running though...

@The-Compiler
Copy link
Member

Hmm, seems like the test fails on Travis?

@olegpidsadnyi olegpidsadnyi force-pushed the fix156 branch 2 times, most recently from fd6be21 to 9952fb5 Compare June 21, 2016 13:11
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 93.641% when pulling 1916f01 on fix156 into de0f667 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 93.641% when pulling eac2c9f on fix156 into de0f667 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 93.641% when pulling cc87b5b on fix156 into de0f667 on master.

@olegpidsadnyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now should be fine

@The-Compiler The-Compiler merged commit 6bed671 into master Jun 21, 2016
@The-Compiler The-Compiler deleted the fix156 branch June 21, 2016 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants