-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33k
Description
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
In the deepcopy
implementation an exception is generated when the memo
dict does not contain a key id(memo)
. We can avoid generating an exception by adding this key when the memo is generated. As a consequence the _keep_alive
method is just a single line of code and we can inline this.
There is a behavior change: a call deepcopy(x, {})
works with current main, but will raise an exception (since the key id(memo)
) has not been set. This might be acceptable as the documentation states "The memo dictionary should be treated as an opaque object." (see https://docs.python.org/3/library/copy.html). And in the code itself the memo
argument is not documented at all
Lines 3 to 9 in 9aea9c1
Interface summary: | |
import copy | |
x = copy.copy(y) # make a shallow copy of y | |
x = copy.deepcopy(y) # make a deep copy of y | |
x = copy.replace(y, a=1, b=2) # new object with fields replaced, as defined by `__replace__` |
There are some unit tests involving the memo
, but those seem to test the behavior of the deepcopy
and not of the memo
argument.
If the behavior change is not acceptable because memo
is part of the public interface, should we then instead document the structure of the argument memo` as being an implementation detail?
The argument _nil
as a sentinel to the deepcopy
is redundant, as the memo
can only contain integers so we can use None
instead.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
No response given
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Projects
Status