-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.9k
gh-115231: fill __module__ for built-in staticmethods #115232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
gh-115231: fill __module__ for built-in staticmethods #115232
Conversation
Objects/typeobject.c
Outdated
} | ||
else if (meth->ml_flags & METH_STATIC) { | ||
PyObject *cfunc = PyCFunction_NewEx(meth, (PyObject*)type, NULL); | ||
PyObject *mod = PyObject_GetAttr((PyObject*)type, &_Py_ID(__module__)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This might theoretically return NULL
and raise AttributeError
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, thanks. Probably we could just clear the error indicator on mod == NULL
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also take a look at GetOptionalAttr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we want ignore here not just AttributeError's. I did similar fix for class methods and got a failure in the test.test_types.UnionTests.test_or_type_operator_with_bad_module().
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is better to use type_module()
for consistency with the rest of this file. It will not give a surprise if Exceptions other than AttributeError should not be ignored.
Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <mail@sobolevn.me>
8d2f05d
to
be1c7ef
Compare
28eec6f
to
c4dec10
Compare
See also #82062: we could fix that issue in a similar approach, using >>> int.to_bytes.__module__
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'method_descriptor' object has no attribute '__module__'. Did you mean: '__reduce__'? |
Objects/typeobject.c
Outdated
} | ||
else if (meth->ml_flags & METH_STATIC) { | ||
PyObject *cfunc = PyCFunction_NewEx(meth, (PyObject*)type, NULL); | ||
PyObject *mod = PyObject_GetAttr((PyObject*)type, &_Py_ID(__module__)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is better to use type_module()
for consistency with the rest of this file. It will not give a surprise if Exceptions other than AttributeError should not be ignored.
d29c90d
to
386f383
Compare
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.