Skip to content

gh-119676: remove several pseudo instructions which are use only in codegen #119677

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

gh-119676: remove several pseudo instructions which are use only in codegen #119677

merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

iritkatriel
Copy link
Member

@iritkatriel iritkatriel commented May 28, 2024 •
edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading

@iritkatriel iritkatriel requested a review from markshannon as a code owner May 28, 2024 17:51
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request May 28, 2024
Closed
carljm
carljm approved these changes May 28, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@carljm carljm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Not sure why I didn't think of this approach (local integer defines outside the opcodes range) initially.

@iritkatriel iritkatriel enabled auto-merge (squash) May 28, 2024 18:00
@iritkatriel iritkatriel merged commit ae9140f into python:main May 28, 2024
noahbkim pushed a commit to hudson-trading/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
@iritkatriel @noahbkim
pythongh-119676: remove several pseudo instructions which are use onl…
1652b47 
…y in codegen (python#119677)
estyxx pushed a commit to estyxx/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
@iritkatriel @estyxx
pythongh-119676: remove several pseudo instructions which are use onl…
bd4ba28 
…y in codegen (python#119677)
@AA-Turner AA-Turner mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@carljm carljm carljm approved these changes

@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon markshannon is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LOAD_SUPER_METHOD etc don't need to be pseudo instructions
2 participants
@iritkatriel @carljm