Skip to content

Conversation

picnixz
Copy link
Member

@picnixz picnixz commented Aug 26, 2025

The online docs feature SHA-256. I actually changed the inline example from SHA-224 to MD5 in a previous PR (#136566) so that it matched the example above, but now I'm updating them both with SHA-256 so that it matches the online docs.

@picnixz picnixz requested review from gpshead and tiran as code owners August 26, 2025 10:08
@picnixz picnixz added skip news needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes and removed needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes labels Aug 26, 2025
@picnixz
Copy link
Member Author

picnixz commented Aug 26, 2025

I didn't backport the previous PR so I won't backport this one either.

@picnixz picnixz enabled auto-merge (squash) August 26, 2025 10:12
@picnixz picnixz disabled auto-merge August 26, 2025 10:12
@picnixz picnixz force-pushed the doc/hashlib/update-docs-136565 branch from 0e1aee4 to 2fcf847 Compare August 26, 2025 10:13
@picnixz picnixz changed the title gh-136565: use SHA-256 for hashlib example instead of MD-5 gh-136565: use SHA-256 for hashlib example instead of MD5 Aug 26, 2025
@picnixz picnixz changed the title gh-136565: use SHA-256 for hashlib example instead of MD5 gh-136565: use SHA-256 for hashlib.__doc__ example instead of MD5 Aug 26, 2025
@picnixz picnixz enabled auto-merge (squash) August 26, 2025 10:14
@picnixz picnixz merged commit 1700cc4 into python:main Aug 26, 2025
43 checks passed
@picnixz picnixz deleted the doc/hashlib/update-docs-136565 branch August 26, 2025 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant