-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-38242: Revert "bpo-36889: Merge asyncio streams (GH-13251)" #16482
Conversation
Thanks for finishing this up Yury. Out of curiosity, what additional changes needed to be made? |
|
.. coroutinefunction:: start_server(client_connected_cb, host=None, \ | ||
port=None, \*, loop=None, limit=2**16, \ | ||
port=None, \*, loop=None, limit=None, \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The constant _DEFAULT_LIMIT
(2**16) is still being used as the default for limit in start_server()
, so this can be restored.
port=None, \*, loop=None, limit=None, \ | |
port=None, \*, loop=None, limit=2**16, \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can do this in a separate PR if needed. This change is rather low priority in comparison to reverting the streaming API, and would not be a release blocker.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, although right now docs are the same as in 3.7. So I'm not sure it's needed tbh.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I'm not sure it's needed tbh.
Okay, I won't worry about it then, it's fairly trivial.
Ah, I wasn't aware we were also removing that change. I hadn't realized we were reverting fully back to the 3.7 API, I thought it was primarily just focused on 23b4b69. Now it makes a lot more sense why you wanted to remove |
@1st1: Please replace |
Thanks @1st1 for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8. |
Sorry, @1st1, I could not cleanly backport this to |
GH-16485 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
See https://bugs.python.org/issue38242 for more details
99% of the work is done by @aeros167; I've just needed to add a few more fixes and couldn't push to his branch; hence the new PR.
https://bugs.python.org/issue38242