Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-30750: Update make patchcheck for blurb and NEWS.d #2381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2017

Conversation

pitrou
Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou commented Jun 24, 2017

No description provided.

@pitrou pitrou added trivial type-feature A feature request or enhancement labels Jun 24, 2017
@mention-bot
Copy link

@pitrou, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @tiran, @birkenfeld and @merwok to be potential reviewers.

@pitrou pitrou changed the title Update make patchcheck for blurb and NEWS.d bpo-30750: Update make patchcheck for blurb and NEWS.d Jun 24, 2017
@ncoghlan ncoghlan merged commit 1ba9469 into python:master Jun 25, 2017
@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @pitrou, good catch!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

🐍🍒⛏🤖 Thanks @pitrou for the PR, and @ncoghlan for merging it 🌮🎉.I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7, 3.6.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @pitrou and @ncoghlan, I had trouble checking out the 2.7 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2017
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-3406 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

pitrou added a commit to pitrou/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2018
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-6576 is a backport of this pull request to the 2.7 branch.

pitrou added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants