Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support type(None) as a type #640

Closed
JukkaL opened this issue Apr 17, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Support type(None) as a type #640

JukkaL opened this issue Apr 17, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
feature topic-pep-484

Comments

@JukkaL
Copy link
Collaborator

JukkaL commented Apr 17, 2015

type(None) should be equivalent to None, as per PEP 484 draft.
@ethanhs ethanhs mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2017
Closed
@ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2017
Merged
@ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi mentioned this issue Sep 24, 2017
Closed
@JukkaL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JukkaL commented May 17, 2018

Or maybe we should update PEP 484 to not suggest that type(None) is valid as a type, and None is the only correct spelling? There should one -- and preferably only one -- obvious way to do it etc.

@msullivan
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't think anyone cares

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature topic-pep-484
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@msullivan @JukkaL