Skip to content

Conversation

colesbury
Copy link
Contributor

@colesbury colesbury commented Jan 9, 2023

Sponsor: Łukasz Langa

Note that the "Discussions-To" field is a placeholder. I'll update the field once the PEP is an official draft and the corresponding thread is created on http://discuss.python.org/.

Sponsor: Łukasz Langa <lukasz at python.org>
@colesbury colesbury requested a review from a team as a code owner January 9, 2023 14:07
@colesbury colesbury changed the title PEP 9999: Making the Global Interpreter Lock Optional in CPython PEP 703: Making the Global Interpreter Lock Optional in CPython Jan 9, 2023
colesbury and others added 2 commits January 9, 2023 09:59
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach self-requested a review January 10, 2023 00:06
Co-authored-by: Qexat <43090614+qexat@users.noreply.github.com>
@ambv ambv merged commit 094ad58 into python:main Jan 10, 2023
@terryjreedy
Copy link
Member

It was not clear to me as I read which proposed changes would be conditional on the new flag and which not.

@ambv
Copy link
Contributor

ambv commented Jan 10, 2023

Let's iterate on this in subsequent PRs and discuss on discuss.python.org:
https://discuss.python.org/t/22606

@cirospaciari
Copy link

awesome news!

@colesbury colesbury deleted the nogil branch April 24, 2023 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants