Skip to content

Conversation

stefanvanburen
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #14702.

@stefanvanburen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I guess this might require #14067 to land first?

This comment has been minimized.

@brianschubert
Copy link
Member

brianschubert commented Sep 12, 2025

I guess this might require #14067 to land first?

The stubsabot PR can't be merged as-is since there's API changes, but
a PR updating stubs to a newer version would be welcome!

(the mypy_primer hits can be ignored -- those are flakes that will be fixed in the next mypy update)

Copy link
Contributor

According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉

@stefanvanburen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@brianschubert / @Avasam let me know if there's anything else to do here now that #14707 landed. Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@srittau srittau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@srittau srittau merged commit add4e85 into python:main Sep 17, 2025
48 checks passed
@stefanvanburen stefanvanburen deleted the svanburen/add-missing-field-descriptor-properties branch September 17, 2025 12:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

google.protobuf.descriptor.FieldDescriptor does not include is_required or is_repeated properties

4 participants