Fix incorrect function signature for conv1d ops

[ethansfng]

Summary: Update dtypes for function xa_nn_conv1d_std_asym8xasym8 call

Differential Revision: D82462394

[pytorch-bot]

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/14302

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 6 Cancelled Jobs, 2 Unrelated Failures

As of commit f6f7263 with merge base 365cab3 ():

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

• pull / unittest / macos / macos-job (gh)
  backends/xnnpack/test/ops/test_cat.py::TestCat::test_fp32_cat5
• pull / unittest-editable / macos / macos-job (gh)
  backends/xnnpack/test/ops/test_conv2d.py::TestConv2d::test_fp32_conv2d

CANCELLED JOBS - The following jobs were cancelled. Please retry:

• periodic / test-models-linux (buck2, mv3, portable, linux.2xlarge, 90) / linux-job (gh)
• periodic / test-models-linux (buck2, mv3, xnnpack-quantization-delegation, linux.2xlarge, 90) / linux-job (gh)
• periodic / test-models-linux (cmake, mv3, portable, linux.2xlarge, 90) / linux-job (gh)
• periodic / test-models-linux (cmake, mv3, xnnpack-quantization-delegation, linux.2xlarge, 90) / linux-job (gh)
• periodic / test-models-linux (cmake, vit, portable, linux.2xlarge, 90) / linux-job (gh)
• periodic / test-models-linux (cmake, vit, xnnpack-quantization-delegation, linux.2xlarge, 90) / linux-job (gh)

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

• pull / test-llama-runner-qnn-linux (fp32, qnn_16a16w, qnn) / linux-job (gh) (detected as infra flaky with no log or failing log classifier)

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

• pull / test-openvino-linux / linux-job (gh) (trunk failure)
  ##[error]The operation was canceled.

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[facebook-github-bot]

@ethansfng has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D82462394.

[github-actions]

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.