Skip to content

Export llama CI #1809

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Export llama CI #1809

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

lucylq
Copy link
Contributor

@lucylq lucylq commented Feb 1, 2024

Fix export_llama CI test.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 1, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/1809

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 0324661 with merge base 7ea3ebd (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 1, 2024
@lucylq lucylq marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2024 21:20
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@lucylq has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@lucylq merged this pull request in fee1528.

@lucylq lucylq deleted the lfq.export-llama-ci branch January 24, 2025 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants