Skip to content

Conversation

pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #7233
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/22/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/22/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/18/orig
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/22/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Dec 7, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7238

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit bba4cf1 with merge base 06e85a8 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Dec 7, 2024
Base automatically changed from gh/lucylq/18/orig to main December 9, 2024 06:14
^

adding more logic to _tensor_spec_to_evalue in the next diff; simplifying it now.

Otherwise, linter error on complexity.

Differential Revision: [D66847875](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D66847875/)

ghstack-source-id: 256981105
Pull Request resolved: #7233
@kirklandsign kirklandsign merged commit b9db0a3 into main Dec 9, 2024
39 of 41 checks passed
@kirklandsign kirklandsign deleted the gh/lucylq/22/orig branch December 9, 2024 06:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. topic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants