Skip to content

Pass in .so name via lower setting (#103968) #104015

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Pass in .so name via lower setting (#103968) #104015

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wushirong
Copy link
Contributor

@wushirong wushirong commented Jun 22, 2023 •
edited by pytorch-bot bot
Loading

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/104015

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit f3c30c7:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D46922444

@wushirong @facebook-github-bot
Pass in .so name via lower setting (pytorch#104015)
f3c30c7 
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#104015

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#103968

Differential Revision: D46922444

fbshipit-source-id: 16c17e5cad87aa1e44cbb9571e78a0cc7ef0eaea
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D46922444

@wushirong
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot ciflow rerun

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 22, 2023

❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:

@pytorchbot: error: argument command: invalid choice: 'ciflow' (choose from 'merge', 'revert', 'rebase', 'label', 'drci')

usage: @pytorchbot [-h] {merge,revert,rebase,label,drci} ...

Try @pytorchbot --help for more info.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jun 22, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@desertfire desertfire desertfire approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged module: inductor
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@wushirong @facebook-github-bot @pytorchmergebot @desertfire