Skip to content

Conversation

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 2, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/110370

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 2 Unrelated Failures

As of commit b566a52 with merge base f878633 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@soulitzer soulitzer added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 2, 2023
# ge
self.assertTrue(is_ge(j1, sympy.Integer(1)))
with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, "indeterminate"):
is_ge(j1, sympy.Integer(3))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This being indeterminate is kind of interesting, it's possible we should just return False here. Well this is fine for now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@soulitzer soulitzer Oct 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah this is a tricky one because sympy only allows overriding of Ge. The other relations (Lt, Gt, Le) are, by consequence, all derived from Ge e.g., Lt(a, b) := !Ge(a, b). This would mean if we define the "indeterminate" j1 >= 3, the also "indeterminate" j0 < 3 will be evaluated to be True!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah fine for now

Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idk if all the rules are right but whatever, we can fix them as we go

@soulitzer soulitzer added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 4, 2023
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
Separating this out so we can check perf more easily

Pull Request resolved: #110371
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
ghstack dependencies: #110044, #110369, #110370
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
@PaliC
Copy link
Contributor

PaliC commented Oct 5, 2023

@pytorchbot revert -m "bottom diff is causing a plethora of internal failures" -c ghfirst

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@soulitzer your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
This reverts commit a7145cb.

Reverted #110370 on behalf of https://github.com/PaliC due to bottom diff is causing a plethora of internal failures ([comment](#110370 (comment)))
@soulitzer soulitzer reopened this Oct 6, 2023
@soulitzer soulitzer closed this Oct 6, 2023
soulitzer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
soulitzer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/soulitzer/237/head branch October 9, 2023 14:24
soulitzer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
soulitzer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
reland of #110370
Pull Request resolved: #110674
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
ghstack dependencies: #110673
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged Reverted topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants