-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.4k
[c10d] Barrier uses stream sync instead of device sync #117804
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/117804
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New Failures, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit 3cc481e with merge base c317bf2 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
81b2693
to
27d5884
Compare
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
I think this change might be BC breaking. Should we call this out? I have previously used |
@awgu Good idea. I added a note to the documentation. Thanks! |
@pytorchbot merge -f "Previous CI trunk failure does not seem related" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
@pytorchbot revert -m "sorry the docs test failure is real, I think it wants the lines after the .. note to be indented https://hud.pytorch.org/pytorch/pytorch/commit/0f6bbb1c070c3a9713893659377e20e147c125f6 https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/7616827874/job/20745016788. There are also some libtorch builds failing. This looks to be some combination of ignoredsignal (docs build) and nosignal (Dr CI classification for docs_test was wrong, pending libtorch jobs)" -c nosignal |
@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here. |
…)" This reverts commit 0f6bbb1. Reverted #117804 on behalf of https://github.com/clee2000 due to sorry the docs test failure is real, I think it wants the lines after the .. note to be indented https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/7616827874/job/20745016788. Marking as nosignal due to bad Dr. CI categorization ([comment](#117804 (comment)))
@kwen2501 your PR has been successfully reverted. |
@pytorchbot merge -f "Failures were from main and unrelated" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
@kwen2501 why this PR updated PocketFFT submodule? |
Accidentally downgraded by force merge of #117804
Accidentally downgraded by force merge of #117804 Pull Request resolved: #118348 Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
Resubmitting #96785 Pull Request resolved: #117804 Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
…)" This reverts commit 0f6bbb1. Reverted #117804 on behalf of https://github.com/clee2000 due to sorry the docs test failure is real, I think it wants the lines after the .. note to be indented https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/7616827874/job/20745016788. Marking as nosignal due to bad Dr. CI categorization ([comment](#117804 (comment)))
Resubmitting #96785 Pull Request resolved: #117804 Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab
Resubmitting #96785
cc @mrshenli @pritamdamania87 @zhaojuanmao @satgera @rohan-varma @gqchen @aazzolini @osalpekar @jiayisuse @H-Huang @awgu @penguinwu @fegin @XilunWu @wanchaol @fduwjj @wz337 @tianyu-l @wconstab @yf225