Skip to content

Conversation

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: jit release notes category label Feb 11, 2024
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 11, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/119661

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit cd04a07 with merge base 02fb043 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, much appreciated

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@soulitzer soulitzer added suppress-bc-linter Suppresses the failures of API backward-compatibility linter (Lint/bc_linter) ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request labels Feb 16, 2024
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@soulitzer soulitzer requested a review from albanD as a code owner February 16, 2024 16:16
@soulitzer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
…#119974)

In many places in the code we use `tree_map_only((SymInt, SymBool, SymFloat), foo)` but with nested ints, it is possible to have SymInts that are non-symbolic, so we may want to do something like `tree_map_only(is_symbolic, foo)` instead.

Alternative: wrap nested int SymNodes with something other than SymInt.

Pull Request resolved: #119974
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #119661
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
Pull Request resolved: #119975
Approved by: https://github.com/jbschlosser
ghstack dependencies: #119661, #119974
@soulitzer soulitzer mentioned this pull request Feb 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/soulitzer/270/head branch March 18, 2024 01:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged module: dynamo release notes: jit release notes category suppress-bc-linter Suppresses the failures of API backward-compatibility linter (Lint/bc_linter) topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants