Skip to content

Conversation

kulinseth
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #80850

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jul 14, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

As of commit a390c7e (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@kulinseth kulinseth requested review from razarmehr July 14, 2022 18:27
Copy link
Collaborator

@razarmehr razarmehr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@kulinseth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @kulinseth.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2022
Summary:
Fixes #80850

Pull Request resolved: #81480
Approved by: https://github.com/razarmehr

Test Plan: contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/e3b98ba7a466ed98e3ca04714203ff7cb9d0dbe8

Reviewed By: DanilBaibak

Differential Revision: D37876475

Pulled By: DanilBaibak

fbshipit-source-id: 6406fca87cc2fda0f621b3c2a6f1ec3668cedc2e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mps Torch Stack Return Value
7 participants