Skip to content

Conversation

ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang commented Nov 29, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

This set tracks symbols which we know are definitely not 0/1, and thus
can be further simplified when we try to work out their static value
without guards. Right now, all allocated symbols are in this set,
but we will later add symbols which don't uphold this.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang ezyang@fb.com

This set tracks symbols which we know are definitely not 0/1, and thus
can be further simplified when we try to work out their static value
without guards.  Right now, all allocated symbols are in this set,
but we will later add symbols which don't uphold this.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 29, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/89871

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit cf28250:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: fx release notes category label Nov 29, 2022
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
This set tracks symbols which we know are definitely not 0/1, and thus
can be further simplified when we try to work out their static value
without guards.  Right now, all allocated symbols are in this set,
but we will later add symbols which don't uphold this.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

ghstack-source-id: 6db6707
Pull Request resolved: #89871
@ezyang ezyang added release notes: composability release notes category topic: not user facing topic category labels Nov 29, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, curious about the next change :D

@ezyang ezyang added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 30, 2022
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
This set tracks symbols which we know are definitely not 0/1, and thus
can be further simplified when we try to work out their static value
without guards.  Right now, all allocated symbols are in this set,
but we will later add symbols which don't uphold this.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#89871
Approved by: https://github.com/albanD
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/ezyang/1610/head branch June 8, 2023 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request release notes: composability release notes category release notes: fx release notes category topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants