Skip to content

[ci skip] Update readme versions for new torch release #4798

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2021
Merged

[ci skip] Update readme versions for new torch release #4798

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2021

Conversation

oke-aditya
Copy link
Contributor

😄 As described

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Oct 29, 2021 •
edited
Loading

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit b2f925f (more details on the Dr. CI page):

  • 8/8 failures introduced in this PR

8 failures not recognized by patterns:

Job Step Action
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.6_rocm4.2 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.7_rocm4.3.1 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.9_rocm4.3.1 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.7_rocm4.2 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.8_rocm4.2 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.9_rocm4.2 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.8_rocm4.3.1 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
CircleCI binary_linux_wheel_py3.6_rocm4.3.1 packaging/build_wheel.sh 🔁 rerun
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@oke-aditya
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like Dr.CI is here too :) I'm wondering why [ci skip] didn't skip the CI checks?

NicolasHug
NicolasHug approved these changes Oct 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[ci skip]

I don't think we have this working lol

Thanks @oke-aditya , good catch!

@NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

I think it needs to be in the commit message, not the PR title.

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit 452ff86 into pytorch:main Oct 29, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

Hey @NicolasHug!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

@oke-aditya
Copy link
Contributor Author

Aah my bad, the head commit should have this, not PR title.

@oke-aditya oke-aditya deleted the updt_readme branch October 29, 2021 14:45
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2021
@fmassa @facebook-github-bot
[fbsync] Update readme with 0.11 version (#4798)
ca8b559 
Summary:
* Update readme for new torch

* Fix typo

Reviewed By: datumbox

Differential Revision: D32064709

fbshipit-source-id: 1c16b501fe31759817cc36f0e2f3f3a7f3396240
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/vision that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2021
@oke-aditya @cyyever
Update readme with 0.11 version (pytorch#4798)
d3e1505 
* Update readme for new torch

* Fix typo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@NicolasHug NicolasHug NicolasHug approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ciflow/default cla signed enhancement module: documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@oke-aditya @facebook-github-bot @NicolasHug