Skip to content

Conversation

yassineAlouini
Copy link
Contributor

In this MR, I add the AlexNet new documentation.

There is one detail: I think the paper link isn't the correct one or maybe I am missing some context?

The one I think is correct is this one: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2012/file/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Paper.pdf.

@yassineAlouini yassineAlouini changed the title AlexNet Nex Documentation. AlexNet New Documentation. Apr 26, 2022
Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @yassineAlouini , LGTM modulo the reference issue that you correctly flagged!

Comment on lines 96 to 97
# TODO: Isn't this the correct paper link?
# https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2012/file/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Paper.pdf
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for flagging this! I think you're correct. Let's use https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2012/hash/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Abstract.html (which doesn't download the pdf immediately)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, will update this and send the fix. 👌

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit 79703b2 into pytorch:main Apr 27, 2022
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
Summary:
* [DOC] Add alexnet new documentation.

* [FIX] Fix wrong alexnet header.

* [FIX] Fix the AlexNet paper link.

Reviewed By: jdsgomes, NicolasHug

Differential Revision: D36095661

fbshipit-source-id: ac3114c7d7d975e4bd01078b90253107fa9a4bc4

Co-authored-by: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants