Skip to content

Conversation

GdoongMathew
Copy link
Contributor

@GdoongMathew GdoongMathew commented Mar 23, 2025

fix #8938.

cc @vfdev-5

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 23, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8994

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @GdoongMathew !

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit f3f2c35 into pytorch:main Mar 26, 2025
1 check passed
@GdoongMathew GdoongMathew deleted the fix/rand_augment branch March 27, 2025 01:10
NicolasHug added a commit to NicolasHug/vision that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2025
…ytorch#8994)

Co-authored-by: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Hug <nh.nicolas.hug@gmail.com>
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2025
…ment`. (#8994)

Reviewed By: scotts

Differential Revision: D77998626

fbshipit-source-id: bf257b040479bad70c09d5858ff3a0d71b7f44a6

Co-authored-by: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Hug <nh.nicolas.hug@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

num_ops argument of RandAugment() shouldn't accept negative values
3 participants