Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix msi reader delayed #319

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2018
Merged

Fix msi reader delayed #319

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2018

Conversation

mraspaud
Copy link
Member

@mraspaud mraspaud commented Jun 5, 2018

Revert msi reader to use delayed until glymur is fixed to avoid multithreading artifacts

  • Tests passed
  • Passes git diff origin/master **/*py | flake8 --diff

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 5, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 67.3% when pulling dfb2ce7 on fix-msi-reader-delayed into 3528bc5 on master.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #319 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #319      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   67.27%   67.3%   +0.02%     
=========================================
  Files         120     120              
  Lines       14675   14676       +1     
=========================================
+ Hits         9873    9877       +4     
+ Misses       4802    4799       -3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
satpy/readers/safe_msi.py 2.52% <0%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
satpy/readers/__init__.py 94.96% <0%> (+1.55%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3528bc5...dfb2ce7. Read the comment docs.

@mraspaud mraspaud merged commit e5949be into master Jun 5, 2018
@mraspaud mraspaud deleted the fix-msi-reader-delayed branch June 5, 2018 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants