You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the AWG-drivers treat the incoming waveforms as if their unit is Voltage and take the respective channels output range into account. However, the offset is ignored. This is because it turned out to be convenient to quickly sweep the offset of a pulse via the offset setting of the awg.
The downside of this is, that the user might expect that the AWG's offset is taken into account when uploading the waveform. I think it is reasonable to add the functionality of ignoring this offset to the AWG interface.
Objections:
Some AWGs can change such a setting themselves at runtime (HDAWG)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the AWG-drivers treat the incoming waveforms as if their unit is Voltage and take the respective channels output range into account. However, the offset is ignored. This is because it turned out to be convenient to quickly sweep the offset of a pulse via the offset setting of the awg.
The downside of this is, that the user might expect that the AWG's offset is taken into account when uploading the waveform. I think it is reasonable to add the functionality of ignoring this offset to the AWG interface.
Objections:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: