Skip to content

Fix 302/304 mixup #260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2024
Merged

Fix 302/304 mixup #260

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ Import your module on the specific page. Note: you'll likely want to use a `cont

## Include a digest of the import map in your ETag

If you're using [ETags](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/ETag) generated by Rails helpers like `stale?` or `fresh_when`, you need to include the digest of the import map into this calculation. Otherwise your application will return 302 cache responses even when your JavaScript assets have changed. You can avoid this with something like:
If you're using [ETags](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/ETag) generated by Rails helpers like `stale?` or `fresh_when`, you need to include the digest of the import map into this calculation. Otherwise your application will return [304](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/304) cache responses even when your JavaScript assets have changed. You can avoid this with something like:

```ruby
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
Expand Down
Loading