[Release 1.20] Adding configuration to run kube proxy as a static pod. #1350
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tic-pod Adding configuration to run kube proxy as a static pod. Signed-off-by: Jamie Phillips <jamie.phillips@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jamie Phillips <jamie.phillips@suse.com>
Kube-proxy was getting deployed twice on a fresh install. This issue was caused by the deploy controller executing before the kube-proxy startup hook was finished. This caused the chart to not get disabled before it was executed. We also noticed that the kube-proxy pod didn't have the required permissions to the node resource. Signed-off-by: Jamie Phillips <jamie.phillips@suse.com>
briandowns
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2021
luthermonson
force-pushed
the
kubeproxy-staticpod-120
branch
from
9b35ffd
to
c689222
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed Changes
Types of Changes
Verification
Linked Issues
#1309
Further Comments