-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
jira doc #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
jira doc #7
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ var opts struct { | |
Repo string `long:"repo" env:"REPO" description:"GitHub repo" required:"true"` | ||
PRNumber int `long:"pr-number" env:"PR_NUMBER" description:"Pull request number" required:"true"` | ||
Test bool `long:"test" env:"TEST" description:"Test mode"` | ||
JiraURL string `long:"jira-url" env:"JIRA_URL" description:"Jira URL"` | ||
JiraURL string `long:"jira-url" env:"JIRA_URL" description:"Jira URL. Example: https://jira.atlassian.com"` | ||
} | ||
|
||
func main() { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The code patch adds a new command-line argument 'JiraURL', which takes a string value representing the Jira URL. The argument is optional, but if provided, it should be a valid URL. There don't appear to be any bug risks associated with this change. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From a quick review, the patch seems to be adding an extra option to the existing command
description
. The new option (--jira-url
) seems to be used to generate Jira links in the description.Since the patch adds only one extra option, it seems to be adding a low risk of potential bugs. However, thorough testing should still be done, especially since the new option might add some complexity to the existing code.
As for improvement suggestions, it would be helpful to have some more context on the project and its requirements to give more specific suggestions. However, in general, it's always good to make sure the code is well-documented and well-organized, follows good coding practices (e.g. is modular, readable, and maintainable), and is properly tested. Additionally, optimizing performance and minimizing external dependencies can also be helpful.