-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Jobs] Fix race condition on submitting multiple jobs with the same id #33259
Merged
architkulkarni
merged 20 commits into
ray-project:master
from
architkulkarni:fix-submission-id-race-condition
Mar 27, 2023
Merged
Changes from 17 commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
935f442
Add env var
architkulkarni 05c1219
Use Ray Constants file
architkulkarni 42e2e3a
Add docstring
architkulkarni c8f5a48
Add unit test
architkulkarni 5c7848a
Add doc
architkulkarni bfea1fd
Add broader unit test
architkulkarni d65eb72
Fix docstring
architkulkarni 7eeef57
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/ray-project/ray into skip…
architkulkarni 51dc3ad
skip_gitignore -> ignore_gitignore
architkulkarni 3232925
Update doc/source/ray-core/handling-dependencies.rst
architkulkarni bda5766
Update doc/source/ray-core/handling-dependencies.rst
architkulkarni ef1f816
Pipe `added_num` through info client
architkulkarni ea5b75a
Add docstring for added_num
architkulkarni bec92fd
Make "check existence and put new info" atomic
architkulkarni ddc2c92
Add unit test
architkulkarni 9049507
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/ray-project/ray into fix-…
architkulkarni cfc425f
Update docstring
architkulkarni 9bc357a
Return bool `new_key_added`
architkulkarni 722a104
Change RuntimeError to ValueError to fix test
architkulkarni dc0f1f6
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/ray-project/ray into fix-…
architkulkarni File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this just be a bool instead of a magic int?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thought about this, but I worry that the bool would be interpreted as "successful." The semantics are different from
num_added
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't have a strong preference either way though, if you think the bool wouldn't be unexpected or weird I'll change it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see your point.
I think if you make it a bool and name it something like
new_key_added
in the docstring and callsite that's probably clearest, but also no strong preference. it just took me awhile to grok this docstring and a bool would've been easier