Skip to content

Conversation

reactjs-translation-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@reactjs-translation-bot reactjs-translation-bot commented Feb 20, 2019

This PR was automatically generated.

Merge changes from reactjs.org at 022c1b2

The following files have conflicts and may need new translations:

  • content/docs/hooks-intro.md
  • content/docs/higher-order-components.md
  • content/docs/addons-test-utils.md

Please fix the conflicts by pushing new commits to this pull request, either by editing the files directly on GitHub or by checking out this branch.

DO NOT SQUASH MERGE THIS PULL REQUEST!

Doing so will "erase" the commits from master and cause them to show up as conflicts the next time we merge.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 20, 2019

Deploy preview for pt-br-reactjs ready!

Built with commit 73e3c16

https://deploy-preview-114--pt-br-reactjs.netlify.com

@tibuurcio tibuurcio added help wanted Task that needs owner 🤖 upstream update Doc has changed in the upstream repo labels Feb 20, 2019
@tibuurcio tibuurcio added needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed and removed help wanted Task that needs owner labels Feb 21, 2019
@tibuurcio tibuurcio requested a review from a team February 21, 2019 01:57
Copy link
Member

@gmsecrieru gmsecrieru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lembre-se de não fazer sqush na hora do merge!

@tibuurcio
Copy link
Collaborator

tibuurcio commented Feb 21, 2019

Hey @tesseralis, quick question. Is it better for us to "create a merge commit" or "rebase and merge" for those sync PR's?
I believe rebase would be better since it would maintain history in a better way, am I correct here? Is there a consensus on this? Thank you.

@fjoshuajr
Copy link
Collaborator

fjoshuajr commented Feb 21, 2019

A gente costuma criar um commit de merge para essas atualizacoes.

Sempre que for necessario fazer o sync: Habilite o allow merge commits nos settings, faça merge do PR e depois desabilite. Deixando somente o squash merge activo.

@fjoshuajr fjoshuajr removed the needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed label Feb 21, 2019
@fjoshuajr fjoshuajr merged commit deb3aa1 into master Feb 21, 2019
@tibuurcio
Copy link
Collaborator

Tá bom! Obrigado @fjoshuajr.

Mas porque desabilitar sempre? 🤔 Já que não devemos fazer squash merge faz mais sentido pra mim deixar essa opção desabilitada, ao invés do "merge commits". Ou então deixar os dois habilitados mesmo, pra não precisar ficar indo nos settings toda vez.

@fjoshuajr
Copy link
Collaborator

@tibuurcio, é que normalmente a gente só lida com merge de traducoes que tem varios 'commitizinhos' então o ideal é juntar todos esses em um só commit, usando o squash merge. Para a gente nao se confundir / enganar na hora do merge, só vai ter uma unica opcao possivel que é o squash. Agora de vez em quando surgem PRs de Sync (que a gente nao pode fazer squash), aí é que a gente usa/habilita o merge commit, mas o resto a gente faz squash.

@jcserracampos jcserracampos deleted the sync-022c1b2f branch July 26, 2019 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖 upstream update Doc has changed in the upstream repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.