-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(RHEL-5991) Do not assign badness to filtered-out syscalls #399
(RHEL-5991) Do not assign badness to filtered-out syscalls #399
Conversation
92fa0e1
to
75ac219
Compare
Commit validationTracker - RHEL-5991 The following commits meet all requirements
Tracker validationSuccess🟢 Tracker RHEL-5991 has set desired product: Pull Request validationSuccess🟢 CI - All checks have passed Auto MergeSuccess🟢 Pull Request is not marked as draft and it's not blocked by |
75ac219
to
99d3647
Compare
99d3647
to
dc86835
Compare
dc86835
to
907c972
Compare
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@dtardon could you please rebase this PR, so CentOS CI would run again. Thank you. |
When `syscall_names_in_filter()` is called in itself, it is already examined with `whitelist`. Or, in other words, `syscall_names_in_filter()` returns bad or good in boolean. So, the returned value should not be compared with `whitelist` again. This replaces #11302. (cherry picked from commit 95832a0) Related: RHEL-5991
Fixes #16451, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856273. (cherry picked from commit 01ecb36) Resolves: RHEL-5991
This information was already available in the debug output, but I think it is good to include it in the message in the table. This makes it easier to wrap one's head around the allowlist/denylist filtering. (cherry picked from commit a9134af) Related: RHEL-5991
907c972
to
ec483af
Compare
Resolves: #2196807