SITE: fix broken links #1520
Merged
SITE: fix broken links #1520
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andy-stark-redis
approved these changes
May 8, 2025
...oss_and_stack/stack-with-enterprise/release-notes/redisstack/redisstack-7.2-release-notes.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...oss_and_stack/stack-with-enterprise/release-notes/redisstack/redisstack-7.2-release-notes.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Thank you, @andy-stark-redis! |
|
Since @kaitlynmichael is out today (5/8/2025), I went ahead and took a shot at updating her section of the broken links sheet. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DOC-5212
I fixed all but the RedisVL content. All the issues with the "
modules.html" embed are solved by removing that file; it's a remnant from the old.comsite and it's no longer needed (confirmed by @rrelledge).I'm leaving row 9 (RedisVL) for @paoloredis; it seems that content is missing from the port automation. Not sure though. I didn't want to make any changes that will just be overwritten next time the automation runs.