Skip to content

fix #1911 - CLIENT NO-EVICT #2124

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 11, 2022
Merged

fix #1911 - CLIENT NO-EVICT #2124

merged 1 commit into from
May 11, 2022

Conversation

leibale
Copy link
Contributor

@leibale leibale commented May 9, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2124 (0ec731e) into master (2ca1ba4) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2124   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.70%   95.71%           
=======================================
  Files         411      412    +1     
  Lines        3799     3803    +4     
  Branches      431      432    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         3636     3640    +4     
  Misses        100      100           
  Partials       63       63           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/client/lib/client/commands.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/client/lib/commands/CLIENT_NO-EVICT.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ca1ba4...0ec731e. Read the comment docs.

@leibale leibale merged commit 53a96cc into redis:master May 11, 2022
@leibale leibale deleted the CLIENT_NO-EVICT branch May 11, 2022 13:36
florian-schunk pushed a commit to florian-schunk/node-redis that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants