We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I've got another for you.
Prototypal inheritence seems not to work properly. Following is the most minimal test case I can think of.
Steps to reproduce: echo "var a = {'a': 'a'}; function F(){} F.prototype = a; console.log((new F()).a);" | otto
Expected result: Prints a single "a" followed by a newline to the console and exits.
Actual result: Prints "undefined" followed by a newline to the console and exits.
Thanks much! Sorry to be the complainer that points out all of your mistakes. ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
defac5b
The configuration for the prototype property was inadvertently being initialized to read-only, rather than write-only:
- self.define(_propertyMode(0), "prototype", toValue(prototype)) + self.define(_propertyMode(propertyModeWrite), "prototype", toValue(prototype))
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks, for the report. I do appreciate them; they help make the project better.
I recently discovered: http://test262.ecmascript.org
I'm going to give those a shot when I have a chance.
Merge pull request robertkrimen#3 from stevenh/arg-processing
b37428d
Fix argument processing for call
No branches or pull requests
I've got another for you.
Prototypal inheritence seems not to work properly. Following is the most minimal test case I can think of.
Steps to reproduce:
echo "var a = {'a': 'a'}; function F(){} F.prototype = a; console.log((new F()).a);" | otto
Expected result:
Prints a single "a" followed by a newline to the console and exits.
Actual result:
Prints "undefined" followed by a newline to the console and exits.
Thanks much! Sorry to be the complainer that points out all of your mistakes. ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: