Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HTML formatting for keyword documentation pop-up #68

Closed
robotframework-ride opened this issue Jun 2, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

HTML formatting for keyword documentation pop-up #68

robotframework-ride opened this issue Jun 2, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement Request for improvement: either for an existing feature or a new one prio-medium Behaving incorrectly, but still somewhat usable
Milestone

Comments

@robotframework-ride
Copy link

Originally submitted to Google Code by @pekkaklarck on 13 Oct 2008

The documentation pop-up shown for keywords uses raw documentation text.
Benefits of using HTML formatted version include:

  • lines are wrapped correctly
  • real tables instead of 'ascii art'
  • possible linking to referenced keywords

It should be possible to use libdoc.py tool for formatting, but it probably
needs some new APIs.

@robotframework-ride
Copy link
Author

Originally submitted to Google Code by @pekkaklarck on 26 Jan 2009

The main focus of 0.13 release is enhancing support for variables. These
our out of the scope.

@robotframework-ride robotframework-ride added this to the 0.15 milestone Jun 2, 2015
@robotframework-ride robotframework-ride added enhancement Request for improvement: either for an existing feature or a new one prio-medium Behaving incorrectly, but still somewhat usable labels Jun 2, 2015
@robotframework-ride
Copy link
Author

Originally submitted to Google Code by @yanne on 24 May 2009

Fixed in r357

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Request for improvement: either for an existing feature or a new one prio-medium Behaving incorrectly, but still somewhat usable
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant