Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Portmonitor] Envelope is lost on receiver #729

Closed
drdanz opened this issue Apr 14, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

[Portmonitor] Envelope is lost on receiver #729

drdanz opened this issue Apr 14, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@drdanz
Copy link
Member

drdanz commented Apr 14, 2016

When connecting a portmonitor on the receiver side, the envelope is lost.

@apaikan
Copy link
Collaborator

apaikan commented Apr 14, 2016

@drdanz would you show me your example?
I have tried the following example and the envelope works fine:

  • Console 1
$ yarpdev --device test_grabber --width 1 --height 1 --framerate 1 --stamp
  • Console 2
$ yarp read /r envelope
yarp: Port /r active at tcp://10.255.72.102:10005
yarp: Receiving input from /grabber to /r using tcp+recv.portmonitor+context.monitors+file.bot_modifier
||| did not find bot_modifier
in create!
2 1460637.03642 [mat] [rgb] (3 8 8 1 1) {0 0 0 1 4 6 0 6} "modified from Lua :)"
3 1460637.03742 [mat] [rgb] (3 8 8 1 1) {0 0 0 1 4 6 0 6} "modified from Lua :)"
4 1460637.03842 [mat] [rgb] (3 8 8 1 1) {0 0 0 1 4 6 0 6} "modified from Lua :)"
...
  • Console 3
yarp connect /grabber /r tcp+recv.portmonitor+context.monitors+file.bot_modifier

@drdanz
Copy link
Member Author

drdanz commented Apr 14, 2016

Sorry, my fault. The issue was actually that for some linking reason the carrier was loaded only on the sender side (even if both processes were running on the same machine using the same lib) and the manager shows that the ports are connected even if the connect failed.

@drdanz
Copy link
Member Author

drdanz commented Sep 22, 2016

Duplicate of #909

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants