switch to std_srvs/Trigger instead of cob_srvs/Trigger

[floweisshardt]

std_srvs/Trigger is in the release pipeline already, see ros/rosdistro#7964.

we'll need to change the dependencies to use std_srvs/Trigger instead of cob_srvs/Trigger

[mathias-luedtke]

In addition all simple_script_sever-related interfaces must be adapted, including other component drivers.

[fmessmer]

I can do the non-ros_canopen part...

[fmessmer]

I did this for all bringup repositories:

• https://github.com/ipa320/cob_command_tools/pull/94
• https://github.com/ipa320/cob_control/pull/31
• https://github.com/ipa320/cob_driver/pull/217
• use new Trigger from std_srvs ipa320/cob_manipulation#51
• use new Trigger from std_srvs ipa320/cob_robots#293
• use new Trigger from std_srvs ipa320/schunk_modular_robotics#135

All other repos do not use Trigger - or did I miss something?

I leave ros_canopen for @ipa-mdl
What about ipa_canopen? For compatibility reasons?

I'd adjust cobvid and hmi_2015 on Wednesday!

Any other packages where we need to change the service?

---

We can keep cob_srvs/Trigger.srv for a while longer, so that we do not break anything...as we do not know who else is using it....

[floweisshardt]

good work @ipa-fxm! I can't think of any other repository.

But I'd like to remove cob_srvs/Trigger because it add no additional value compared to std_srvs/Trigger. By removing cob_srvs/Trigger we assure that it pops up if it is still used anywhere else.