Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ur_description: Use the per-model xacro files for correct robot name #588

Merged

Conversation

fmauch
Copy link
Contributor

@fmauch fmauch commented Sep 29, 2021

With the common xacro file the robot name will always be "ur".
However, the moveit config packages expect the robot name to be e.g. "ur10e".
This commit will use the macros containing the model name already.

This fixes #585 and should help in #538.

With the common xacro file the robot name will always be "ur".
However, the moveit config packages expect the robot name to be e.g. "ur10e".
This commit will use the macros containing the model name already.
Copy link
Member

@gavanderhoorn gavanderhoorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not too thrilled about the robot_model argument (should it be called 'variant'?), as this adds yet another argument to an already long list.

But it's not exposed to users (they probably don't want to use the base load_ur.launch) and it does solve the problem.

@gavanderhoorn gavanderhoorn merged commit 9d02cca into ros-industrial:melodic-devel-staging Sep 29, 2021
@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

Thanks @fmauch 👍

@fmauch fmauch deleted the correct_robot_name branch September 29, 2021 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants