Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix type error in newer versions of urdf #1098

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2017
Merged

fix type error in newer versions of urdf #1098

merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2017

Conversation

wjwwood
Copy link
Member

@wjwwood wjwwood commented May 2, 2017

I believe this should fix the compiler errors of the latest rviz release on some platforms which were introduced in: #1079

@wjwwood wjwwood self-assigned this May 2, 2017
@wjwwood wjwwood merged commit 4d7f081 into kinetic-devel May 2, 2017
@wjwwood wjwwood deleted the fix_1079 branch May 2, 2017 21:08
wjwwood added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2017
@wjwwood
Copy link
Member Author

wjwwood commented Jun 5, 2017

Backported in #1110

wjwwood added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2017
* Add fullscreen option. (#1017)

* urdfdom compatibility (#1064)

* Use urdf::*ShredPtr instead of boost::shared_ptr (#1044)

urdfdom_headers uses C++ std::shared_ptr. As it exports it as custom
*SharedPtr type, we can use the to sty compatible.

This also adds a proper dependency for urdfdom-headers

* adaptions to build against both urdfdom 0.3 and 0.4

... relying on the compatibility layer of urdf package

* Update display if empty pointcloud2 is published (#1073)

Do not show last point cloud any more, if published point cloud message does not contain any points

* Correctly scale the render panel on high resolution displays (#1078)

* support multiple material for one link (#1079)

* Fixed duplicate property name for Path colors (#1089)

See issue #1087.

* fix type error in newer versions of urdf (#1098)

* Use unique material names for robot links. (#1102)

* avoid C++11 feature for back port to indigo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant